enfrdeitptrues
Wednesday, 15 August 2018 09:52

BRIEFING: All you need to know about South Sudan's new power-sharing accord

Written by IrinNews
Rate this item
(0 votes)
After months of negotiations aimed at ending a civil war that has killed tens of thousands of people and forced some 4.5 million from their homes since December 2013, South Sudan’s President Salva Kiir and rebel leader Riek Machar signed new power-sharing and ceasefire agreements on 5 August.

The conflict, coupled with a dire national economy, the difficulty of delivering humanitarian aid to warring areas, and the widespread disruption of livelihoods, has left some 60 percent of the population at risk of not getting enough to eat.

This briefing, drawn from interviews with analysts, rights advocates, aid workers, and refugees, assesses whether the new agreements represent a major milestone in ending the civil war or are more likely another false dawn for efforts to forge lasting peace.

What exactly did the parties sign?

The title of the document is a bit of a mouthful: Agreement on Outstanding Issues on Governance and Security Arrangements. Its signature by Kiir, Machar, and, in a last-minute policy U-turn, representatives of several other armed groups (under the umbrella of the South Sudan Opposition Alliance), marks another step towards the signing of a revitalised Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS).

The original ARCSS, supposedly a comprehensive peace deal, was inked in 2015 (by fewer signatories) but quickly collapsed. It was derided by some as fundamentally ill-conceived. The main difference between it and the new power-sharing formula is that the envisaged cabinet and parliament have been expanded to include more people.

Other recent steps in resuscitating the ARCSS were the 27 June signing of the Khartoum Declaration – which included a permanent ceasefire (which is largely holding) and a commitment to withdraw troops from urban centres – and a detailed agreement on security arrangements signed on 6 July.

Three days after signing the latest power-sharing agreement, the president granted a general amnesty to Machar and other rebel leaders. Another round of talks began in Khartoum on 13 August to tackle some unresolved issues.

What does the deal mean for civilians in need?

More than six million people in South Sudan are facing “crisis” or “emergency” levels of acute food insecurity, according to UN agencies. “Emergency” is just one level down from the worst situation, famine, which reached some parts of the country in early 2017.

In areas affected by conflict, “it will be difficult for households... to realise a harvest… and the possibility of extreme food insecurity through to January 2019 will remain,” the UN agencies warned, pointing in particular to Leer and Mayendit counties in former Unity State, in the Greater Upper Nile region.

Several aid agencies told IRIN they see potential for the latest deal to bring an end to the suffering of millions of civilians, especially if it leads to improved access to areas where it has been too dangerous to deliver assistance.

“When people see aid workers doing their work in safety, they will be better able to conduct their own day to day activities,” said Rosalind Crowther, country director for CARE.

But the country’s 12 million citizens are not a primary consideration for the agreement’s signatories, according to Jok Maduk Jok, a former government minister who is now the executive director of the Sudd Institute, an independent research group.

“Leaders will now work for their entry into public offices, but none of them will think about the people who suffered so gravely from a war that was none of their choosing,”  he wrote in a Facebook post.

How will power be shared?

The latest agreement paves the way for Machar to return to South Sudan as one of five vice-presidents under Kiir in a three-year transitional government of national unity, due to be formed within three months of the final peace deal being signed. No date for that key event has been set.

The agreement also provides for a 35-strong cabinet, with 20 ministers drawn from the government, nine from Machar’s Sudan People's Liberation Movement-in-Opposition and six from representatives of other opposition groups. The legislative assembly will have 550 lawmakers, 332 from government, and 128 from the opposition.

There has been a reduction in fighting since the Khartoum Declaration was signed, and humanitarian access to several areas has improved.

“Leaders will now work for their entry into public offices, but none of them will think about the people who suffered so gravely from a war that was none of their choosing.”

What role did regional and global leaders play?

Pressure from the likes of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, and his Sudanese and Kenyan counterparts Omar al-Bashir and Uhuru Kenyatta, coupled with a 13 July UN Security Council arms embargo and extended targeted sanctions, helped drive Kiir and Machar to sign the power-sharing deal.

Daniel Akech Thiong, an independent consultant focused on politics and economics on South Sudan, said the pair were keen not to disappoint their respective backers, Museveni (in the case of Kiir) and al-Bashir (for Machar) “who are themselves motivated by the hope of cashing in during peacetime… [having] seen an economic opportunity to exploit, but which requires the end of the civil war.”

Thiong pointed to the $26 Khartoum receives in fees for every barrel of oil that landlocked South Sudan exports through Sudan, and explained that “South Sudan's share of the oil wealth will be spent on buying goods from Uganda.”  

Is the end of the war within sight?

Relief and some jubilation swept across Juba when news of the signing of the new accords reached the South Sudanese capital. But a tweet from Museveni, one of the guarantors of the peace process, immediately put things in perspective. “We are congratulating ourselves over many dead bodies in South Sudan over the last four years,” he wrote.

A reality check was provided on 10 August when Britain, the United States, and Norway – the so-called “Troika” that helped end Sudan’s protracted civil war in 2005 and deliver South Sudan’s independence six years later – dismissed the current peace process as a road to nowhere.

“We are concerned that the arrangements agreed to date are not realistic or sustainable,” they said in a joint statement. “The best hope for sustainable peace is a process inclusive of ordinary men and women, civil society, religious leaders, ethnic minorities, and other excluded groups.”

Jok’s assessment echoed some of those concerns. “The threats to this arrangement will most likely come from outside the government, from youth groups, from ethnic communities that were most affected by conflict that are clearly excluded and who will now be waiting for some sort of reparations in the form of money and reconstruction efforts,” he told IRIN.

A reality check was provided on 10 August when Britain, the United States, and Norway – the so-called “Troika” that helped end Sudan’s protracted civil war in 2005 and deliver South Sudan’s independence six years later – dismissed the current peace process as a road to nowhere.

For Juliette Paauwe, research analyst at the US-based Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, it will take more than a power-sharing deal between two bitter enemies who have already broken about 10 previous agreements to end the bloodshed.

“Only time will tell if this agreement will last or simply be a brief pause before the killing resumes,” she said. “The people of South Sudan deserve lasting peace with justice, not gestures without substance.”

Could the conflict, in fact, escalate?

Mistrust, rather than reconciliation, still defines the relationship between Kiir and Machar, a fact underlined by the former’s snubbing of the latter’s bid for a handshake at the signing ceremony.

This mistrust “is a major risk factor for relapse to war,” warned Jok.

Thijs Van Laer of International Refugee Rights Initiative, an advocacy group, lamented the absence of any reference to accountability in the agreement.

“Not only does the document fail to reaffirm the urgent need to judge those responsible, but it also further empowers those responsible for atrocities, by giving them positions and resources, and fails to mention how spoilers of the agreement will be sanctioned,” he said.

Van Laer suggested some of those who signed the deal had been pressured to do so and that this makes it more likely they will take up arms again, while other individuals or groups might be tempted to resort to violence “to get a slice of the cake”.

Mike Brand, a US-based conflict and atrocities prevention consultant, pointed to other glaring omissions.

“This new agreement has many unanswered questions and doesn’t do anything to solve the underlying political and security issues that led to conflict in 2013 and 2016, many of which could easily cause the entire process to derail,” he said.

Priscilla Pita, one of 60,000 South Sudanese living in the Imvepi Refugee Settlement in the Ugandan district of Arua, agreed. “It might be a short-lived deal and war breaks out again. We are tired of this war. We can’t continue suffering. We need peace, freedom, and joy,” she said.

Fellow refugee John Dada said he feared the latest deal would remain mere “ink and paper”. “But let it be the last chance. If they fail to implement and continue with war, the International Criminal Court should hold them accountable for war crimes.”

However, another refugee, Agnes Poni, was more optimistic. “I see seriousness. I congratulate President Kiir and Machar. They will implement it,” she said.

“It might be a short-lived deal and war breaks out again. We are tired of this war. We can’t continue suffering. We need peace, freedom, and joy.”

What next?

Issues under discussion in the current round of talks include the powers of the president and vice-presidents, representation in the judicial authority, as well as revision of the country’s administrative division and the naming of new ministries.

A number of other issues need to be resolved to improve the chances of lasting peace, including: the logistics of organising elections, how to integrate some rebel fighters into a national army and demobilise others, and how a cash-strapped government will fund the enlarged administration and still pay for essential goods and services across the country.

In its statement, the Troika underscored the importance of clarifying “how resources will be used in a transparent and accountable way for the benefit of all South Sudanese… how security will be provided in Juba during the transition period, and how meaningful checks will be placed on executive power.”

Another key challenge will be dealing with armed groups not party to the agreement such as the People’s Democratic Movement and the National Salvation Front.

Kiir and Machar have little to no command and control over various splinter groups within their respective forces, a fact that several analysts pointed to as one of the most considerable obstacles to resolving the conflict.

As Jok put it: the “massive elephant in the room” is “how to translate this elite pact into peace for all communities, overcoming the communal feuds that were made worse by the elite rivalry but not resolved by the peace deal.”

(TOP PHOTO: President Salva Kiir, right, shakes hands with rival Riek Machar. CREDIT: Sumy Sadurni/AFP)

Read 139 times Last modified on Wednesday, 15 August 2018 09:55

Media

https://www.irinnews.org/analysis/2018/08/14/briefing-all-you-need-know-about-south-sudan-s-new-power-sharing-accord

9 comments

  • Comment Link zvodretiluret Monday, 10 December 2018 10:16 posted by: Guest zvodretiluret

    Good write-up, I am regular visitor of one’s blog, maintain up the excellent operate, and It's going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

  • Comment Link futbol.run Womens EURO - Katarina Strožová Monday, 19 November 2018 19:05 posted by: Guest futbol.run Womens EURO - Katarina Strožová

    Manchester City defender John Stones believes Raheem Sterling deserved far more credit for his performances at the World Cup and was upset by the negativity aimed at his team-mate. 'He has such a great mentality': John Stones backs Raheem Sterling to recover from 'ridiculous' World Cup treatment to star for club and country

  • Comment Link Football Solutions - Womens EURO 2009 - Kazakhstan-FYROM Statistics Friday, 09 November 2018 23:03 posted by: Guest Football Solutions - Womens EURO 2009 - Kazakhstan-FYROM Statistics

    Inter Milan, Everton, Atletico Bilbao and old foes Legia Warsaw are just four of the teams that Scottish champions Celtic could face. Celtic desperate for a glamour tie in Europa League last 32, admits manager Ronny Deila

  • Comment Link 醫學美容 舒顏萃 cosmetic.wiki Friday, 19 October 2018 11:38 posted by: Guest 醫學美容 舒顏萃 cosmetic.wiki

    不再局限於安全色!這4種穿搭配色絕對時尚又驚喜 - STYLE-TIPS.COM 像全黑、全白或黑白配這類安全色相信最多人穿著,因為最不容易出錯又易襯。但只穿安全...

  • Comment Link 收毛孔方法 Wednesday, 17 October 2018 20:12 posted by: Guest 收毛孔方法

    瞬間滲透肌膚,讓肌膚緊緻和富有彈性;迅速從肌底締造晶瑩亮澤的白皙肌膚。

  • Comment Link 醫學美容 隆乳按摩 cosmetic.wiki Tuesday, 16 October 2018 22:05 posted by: Guest 醫學美容 隆乳按摩 cosmetic.wiki

    法國女人早起、夜蒲,化妝依然精緻的 7 個小秘密 Harpersbazaar HK 法國女人最懂得生活享受,街上總能看見化妝漂亮的法國女人,穿着性感時尚;晚上結伴閨蜜喝喝紅酒抽抽烟,化妝依然精緻美麗。一位在巴黎生活的法國留學生,悄悄告訴你法國女人從早到晚化妝一直優雅漂亮的秘訣。最時髦的法國女人,教你如何從早至晚化妝依然美麗的秘密。

  • Comment Link 電波拉皮價錢 Tuesday, 16 October 2018 18:57 posted by: Guest 電波拉皮價錢

    介紹底粧系列中的粉底産品。

  • Comment Link 醫學美容 底霜 cosmetic.wiki Monday, 15 October 2018 15:14 posted by: Guest 醫學美容 底霜 cosmetic.wiki

    Fresh Line 【精油香氛泡澡球】蕾朵精油香氛泡澡球的商品介紹 Fresh Line,精油香氛泡澡球,蕾朵精油香氛泡澡球

  • Comment Link furtdso linopv Saturday, 08 September 2018 23:43 posted by: Guest furtdso linopv

    There are certainly a variety of details like that to take into consideration. That is a nice point to deliver up. I supply the thoughts above as normal inspiration however clearly there are questions just like the one you carry up the place the most important factor will probably be working in sincere good faith. I don?t know if finest practices have emerged around things like that, however I'm positive that your job is clearly identified as a good game. Both girls and boys really feel the impact of just a second’s pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.